December 2013 Global Regulatory Update
December 3, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update provides updates on current work streams in recovery and resolution, GSIB data requirements, shadow banking, liquidity, accounting, regulatory capital, and insurance, as well as upcoming events.
GFMA-IIF Joint Letter on Securities Lending and Repo
November 28, 2013 — The Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA) and the IIF jointly submitted a response to the Financial Stability Board’s consultation paper titled Annex 2: Proposed Regulatory Framework for Haircuts on Non-Centrally Cleared Securities Financing Transactions (issued in August 2013). The consultation, which was a subsection of the FSB’s Policy Framework for Addressing Shadow Banking Risks in Securities Lending and Repos proposes a haircut framework. The framework comprises of: minimum qualitative standards for methodologies used by market participants to calculate haircuts; and numerical haircut floors that will apply to non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions in which “Unregulated Entities” receive financing from regulated financial intermediaries against collateral other than government securities.
Second IIF Asia Pacific CRO Forum for 2013
November 19, 2013 — The second IIF Asia Pacific Chief Risk Officer Forum of the year, hosted by BNP Paribas, was held in Hong Kong on November 18 and 19. The forum brought together risk officers from the Asia Pacific region to exchange ideas and valuable insights on issues related to risk management. The forum discussions included changes in risk management, enhanced disclosures, impacts of liquidity regulation, global and regional economic outlook, the current regulatory reform agenda, and implications of the current regulatory reforms and macroeconomic changes within the Asian context.
IIF SAG Comments on IFRS 9 Effective Date
November 13, 2013 — The IIF Senior Accounting Group (SAG) asked the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) to consider providing a mandatory effective date of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments not less than three years after the date of issuance of the final version of IFRS 9. A similar request applies to Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) – Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (subtopic 825-15) and Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10) – (ASU).
November 2013 Global Regulatory Update
November 6, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update provides updates on current work streams in insurance, GSIB data requirements, recovery, resolution, regulatory capital, liquidity, and governance, as well as upcoming events.
IIF Responds to FSB Proposal on Assessment Methodology
October 31, 2013 — The IIF submitted a comment letter on October 31 in response to the Financial Stability Board’s consultative document on the methodology for assessing compliance with the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution for Financial Institutions, issued on August 28, 2013. The letter expressed the IIF’s broad support for creating a uniform set of standards to be used in determining a jurisdiction’s compliance with the Key Attributes, but it strongly suggested as well that the methodology not broaden the substance of the Key Attributes and not be cited as authority for interpretations expanding or modifying the Key Attributes. In addition, the letter raised a number of observations specific to the text of the document, including points related to sector-specific matters, information sharing among jurisdictions, contractual cross-border recognition clauses, and the protection of client assets.
Joint Association letter to the FSB on Phases 2 and 3 of the Common Data Template for G-SIBs
October 21, 2013 — The Institute of International Finance (IIF), the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA), The Clearing House Association L.L.C. (TCH), and the Federation of Finnish Financial Services (FFI) (together, “the Associations”) submitted a letter to the FSB Data Requirements Workstream (DRW) as a follow-up to the October 2-3 workshop on Phases 2 and 3 of the FSB Common Data Template (CDT) for G-SIBs. The letter provide comments and feedback on both the CDT approach and process and the technical details of the templates, which amplify or add to the comments made at the workshop. The letter starts with a reiteration of the major themes the industry raised at the workshop, followed by detailed discussions of our comments on the Phases 2 and 3 templates.
IIF Responds to FSB Proposal on Non-Bank Resolution
October 17, 2013 — The IIF submitted three comment letters on October 15 in response to the Financial Stability Board’s consultative document on the application of the Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes to non-bank financial institutions. Responding to Appendix I, on the resolution of financial market infrastructures (FMI) and systemically important FMI participants, the IIF joined with the International Swaps and Derivatives Associations (ISDA), The Clearing House, and the Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA) in addressing key factors that arise in FMI resolution, such as the need for transparency and certainty and the importance of respecting the waterfall procedures and the arrangements of the FMI with its participants. The IIF also provided comments on Appendix II, on the resolution of insurers, noting that the recovery and resolution framework should be tailored to the characteristics of the industry, the specific risk profile of insurers and the limited circumstances in which systemic risk can be originated by insurers. Finally, in response to Appendix III, on client asset protection in resolution, the IIF recommended that any changes to the client-protection framework be done in a way that minimizes the potential adverse effects on competitions and that allows firms to offer appropriate financial services to their clients.
IIF Responds to FSB Proposal on Information Sharing
October 17, 2013 — The IIF submitted a comment letter on October 15 in response to the Financial Stability Board’s consultative document on information sharing for resolution purposes. The IIF welcomed the efforts by the FSB to design a system for exchanging information across borders, noting that information sharing will be essential for making cross-border bank resolution work. As suggested in the letter, the FSB should work to ensure consistency in standards and to find an appropriate balance between providing sufficient information and protecting the confidentiality of that information. The letter also noted the importance of the G20 staying engaged and committed in this field, since the confidentiality issues involved in this area are such that they may require that further legislation be adopted.
Associations Submit Response to CPSS-IOSCO on FMI Recovery
October 17, 2013 — On October 11, the IIF, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, and The Clearing House submitted a joint letter to the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in response to the consultative report on recovery of financial market infrastructures (FMIs). The letter focused on the recovery mechanisms for central counterparties (CCPs). It noted that the overall recovery framework should consider a CCP’s default management process, be clearly defined and well understood by all clearing participants, and contain sufficient flexibility to ensure voluntary mechanisms are available prior to the application of mandatory tools. With respect to the tools that could be applied at the end of the CCP default waterfall, it suggested that assessment powers and variation margin gains haircutting are the most effect mechanisms to allocate losses related to a participant default.
IIF-GFMA Joint Comment Letter on Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) Disclosure Standards
October 14, 2013 — On October 14, the IIF and GFMA submitted comments on the Basel Committee’s consultative document on Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure Standards, issued on July 19, 2013. The proposed disclosure standards are intended to improve transparency of regulatory liquidity requirements, enhance market discipline, and educate market participants as the LCR is implemented. The comment letter notes with appreciation that the Basel Committee has made efforts to deal with the unique nature of liquidity disclosure. But it points out certain areas where improvements could made, in particular, questioning the requirement to disclose data based on averages of daily observations. Essentially, while daily data is available and prepared from time to time for supervisory observation and analysis, it is usually not in a form that can readily meet internal and regulatory standards for public disclosure. Furthermore, the comment letter notes that it would be beneficial to consider phasing in public liquidity disclosure, to allow enough time for supervisors, as well as the industry, to get more comfortable with the nature of disclosures that would be made and how they may be understood by the public.
IIF to Engage in Constructive Dialogue with IAIS on Plans for a Global Insurance Capital Standard
October 13, 2013 — IIF today released a statement ahead of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors’ Annual conference, after the IAIS announced they would develop a global insurance capital standard by 2016.
IIF and ISDA respond to Basel Committee consultation on Balancing Risk Sensitivity, Simplicity and Comparability
October 11, 2013 — The IIF, together with ISDA, submitted a joint response to the BCBS consultative document Balancing Risk Sensitivity, Simplicity and Comparability. The associations commend the Basel Committee for providing the opportunity to discuss various alternatives to improve the current capital framework before concrete proposals are on the table. The associations dispute that the Leverage Ratio represents a simple and comparable standard, point out some repercussions of using standardized floors, and propose ways to improve the capital standards without undue loss of risk sensitivity as this could lead to misallocation of capital and mispricing. The associations recommend enhanced disclosure, benchmarks based on internal model data, and a focused review on how internal models could be changed to achieve a higher degree of convergence and harmonization, as possible ways forward.
IIF Submission to IASB and FASB on Securitized Assets
October 10, 2013 — The IIF Senior Accounting Group sent a letter to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to ask them to consider modifying and clarifying the existing language in their guidance for classifying securitizations for financial reporting purposes (amortized cost, fair value through Other Comprehensive Income, or fair value through the income statement), assessing the Solely Payment of Principal and Interest (SPPI) characteristics of securitized assets, which is one of the tests for amortized cost classification. The letter does not suggest changing the securitized assets classification requirement set out in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement, but aims to ensure that the look-through requirements can be applied in a pragmatic and workable manner. Some wording to that effect was proposed to be added in the application guidance of the eventual standard.
IIF releases staff note on promoting sound risk culture
October 10, 2013 — IIF staff have released an issues paper on promoting sound risk culture. The paper builds on the observations made by participants to a symposium on supervision and risk culture that the IIF held in July 2013.
The paper has three sections.
IIF and BAFT-IFSA submits Clarification Questions on Monitoring Tools for Intraday Liquidity Management
October 9, 2013 — On October 9, the Institute of International Finance, jointly with BAFT-IFSA (the Bankers’ Association for Finance and Trade (BAFT) and the International Financial Services Association (IFSA)) submitted a set of clarification questions regarding the Monitoring Tools for Intraday Liquidity Management, which was finalized by the Basel Committee and the Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems (CPSS) in April of this year. As banks prepare for implementation of the monitoring tools, it has been realized that some challenges arising primarily from the possibility of varying interpretations of the monitoring tools, could lead to inconsistent application of the tools. The clarification questions identifies areas where clarification or interpretive guidance by the Basel Committee and CPSS will be useful in ensuring a more efficient and effective application of the tools to adequately measure intraday liquidity.
IIF and other associations respond to Basel Committee consultation on Capital Requirements for Banks’ Equity Investments in Funds
October 4, 2013 — The IIF, together with the Global Financial Markets Association and International Banking Federation have responded to a Basel Committee consultation on Capital Requirements for Banks’ Equity Investments in Funds.
The response welcomes the decision to develop a revised capital regime and supports the BCBS’s decision to look at all types of funds. It suggests though that to be truly effective and beneficial, any approach adopted should: balance the need for a coherent framework for all types of funds with the need for sufficient differentiation between specific types of funds; incentivize financial institutions to collect sufficient information on the underlying funds; be coordinated with and avoid overlaps with requirements in existing regulation and with other regulatory initiatives; consider the impact on end-users of financial services and the wider economy; and above all, be targeted and proportionate to the risks.
October 2013 Global Regulatory Update
October 1, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update provides updates on current work streams.
IIF Submits Comment Letter on FSB’s Principles for An Effective Risk Appetite Framework
September 30, 2013 — The Institute submitted a comment letter on September 30, in response to the Financial Stability Board’s consultative document on developing Principles for Effective Risk Appetite Frameworks (RAF) for banks. The Principles are, in certain areas, broadly aligned with the IIF’s thinking, reflected in the reports Implementing Robust Risk Appetite Frameworks to Strengthen Financial Institutions (2011) and Governance for Strengthened Risk Management. The IIF supports the need to foster strong risk culture, to develop top-down and bottom-up processes in setting up RAFs, and to effectively communicate risk appetite throughout a firm as the Principles advocate. However, the comment letter outlined a few areas for clarification and emphasis, such as the iterative nature of the RAF process and its alignment with the business planning process. The comment letter also raised concerns about the extensive role that has now been assigned to the internal audit in the RAF process.
Joint associations respond to the BCBS NIMM proposal
September 27, 2013 — The IIF, ISDA, and GFMA submitted a joint response to the BCBS consultative document The non-internal-model method for capitalizing counterparty credit risk exposures (the NIMM). The associations welcome the consultative document as a significant step in the right direction in addressing many of the long-standing concerns regarding the Current Exposure Method (CEM). As an alternative to CEM, it is clear that NIMM has the potential to perform better as a measure of exposure. However, there are certain products and circumstances where the associations are concerned that NIMM does not appropriately recognize the reality of some collateral and netting arrangements thus resulting in disproportionately high levels of exposure. The joint response provides details of the specific concerns and suggestions on how these could be addressed.
Joint associations respond to the BCBS proposal on the capital treatment of bank exposures to central counterparties
September 27, 2013 — The IIF, ISDA, and GFMA submitted a joint response to the BCBS consultative document Capital treatment of bank exposures to central counterparties. The associations commend the BCBS for conducting another consultation on this issue, and consider the consultation as a significant progress in developing an appropriate capital framework for cleared derivatives. However, based on initial analysis, the associations are concerned that the proposal may be inconsistent with the G20 objectives of promoting central clearing, does not provide incentives for central counterparties to invest in the improvement of their risk systems and methodologies, and discourages fundamental CCP risk practices, notably the contribution of default fund. The joint response provides some examples to illustrate these points.
IIF Comment Letter on Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Going Concern Presumption
September 24, 2013 — The IIF Senior Accounting Group (SAG) sent a comment letter on September 24, 2013 to the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) on the FASB exposure draft on Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Going Concern Presumption. The IIF SAG urged the FASB and the IASB to issue convergent disclosure requirements on going-concern issues. This exposure draft is the result of a request from the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) to the FASB to specify new requirements for disclosure of going-concern presumptions. The IAASB also asked the IASB to improve its standard on going-concern disclosure. These initiatives reflect complaints that investors did not understand “going concern” opinions that had been given on firms that had difficulties during the crisis.
IIF’s Kevin Nixon in Markit Magazine on Leverage Ratio
In a commentary piece in Markit Magazine, IIF Managing Director Kevin Nixon discusses the use of a leverage ratio as a backstop component of a global capital regulatory framework, while focusing on the importance of ensuring capital regulation continues to utilize risk-weighting of assets. “A leverage ratio does not, in fact, cannot by definition, take into account the riskiness of the asset base,” Nixon wrote.
Joint Trades Basel Supplemental Leverage Ratio Comment Letter
September 20, 2013 — The IIF, ISDA, and AFME submitted a joint letter to the BCBS responding to the consultative document on the Revised Basel III Leverage Ratio Framework and Disclosure Requirements. In summary, the letter reiterated industry support for a backstop measure to the risk based framework in the form of a leverage ratio while stressing that the newly proposed definition increases the denominator of the leverage ratio up to the point of overstating economic exposure and making it into the binding capital measure for many banks. In the view of the industry such an outcome could create perverse incentives including, but not limited to, the holding of riskier assets. The letter recommends that exposure measures are amended to recognize the exposure reducing effects of cash collateral and netting, and recommends further to recalibrate Credit Conversion Factors for other off balance sheet assets, and to excluding certain transaction types.
IIF Comment Letter to the FASB and the IASB on Leases
September 13, 2013 — On September 13, 2013, The IIF Senior Accounting Group (SAG) commented on the joint FASB-IASB Exposure Draft ED/2013/6, Leases (May 2013). Under the proposed standards, a lessee is deemed to have acquired use of the underlying asset, and it pays for that right with a lease payment. An asset for its right to use the underlying asset (a right-of-use asset (RoU)), and a liability to pay rent would be recognized in the balance sheet. The IIF SAG does not support the proposals for two main reasons. First, it is convinced that the required efforts would be disproportionate compared to any real benefits for users. Users appear to oppose the proposals. Second, the treatment of the RoU for regulatory purposes is unknown. Regulators might either consider RoU assets or lease liabilities on a net basis which would maintain the current depiction of the economic substance and risk profile of operating leases or consider only the RoU asset as an asset, which would greatly affect the calculation of risk-weighted assets, especially if RoU assets are treated as intangibles. The IIF SAG believes that current lease accounting is well understood and it would be more cost effective to meet users’ needs by improving the disclosure on a consistent basis for both IFRS and U.S. GAAP.
September 2013 Global Regulatory Update
September 3, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update provides updates on current work streams.
IIF comments to the IAIS consultation on Supervision of Cross-Border Operations Through Branches
August 15, 2013 — On August 15, 2012 the IIF submitted a letter providing comments on the IAIS draft issues paper on “Supervision of Cross-Border Operations Through Branches”. The Issues Paper provides an overview of current practices and challenges in supervising branches. In its comments, the IIF highlighted that the document still features an underlying bias against branches rather than being neutral, balanced and based on factual, empirical research. There are a number of important aspects related to branches that are not yet sufficiently considered in the consultation document. As an example, a branch structure allows for larger and better-diversified parent balance sheet. Further, the paper should note that a branch is subject to the same governance structure as its parent, creating the need for a close collaboration between the host and home supervisors and also the opportunity for more effective supervision through such collaboration. The IIF suggests that the IAIS should extend its empirical research and literature review in a balanced way before drawing any conclusions about the branch structure as opposed to other forms of legal entities.
IIF Comments on Substituted Compliance elements of SEC Rule Proposal on Cross-Border Security-Based Swap Activities
August 9, 2013 — The IIF has submitted a comment letter in response to a US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule Proposal on Cross-Border Security-Based Swap Activities.
The IIF’s response strongly supports the underlying concept and broad outlines of the substituted compliance elements of the rule proposal (situations in which the SEC would consider permitting compliance with comparable regulatory requirements in a foreign jurisdiction to substitute for compliance with SEC regulatory requirements) and commends the SEC for its considered and balanced approach. The IIF points out that if adopted, this approach would be beneficial for financial stability in the United States and more widely, beneficial for end-users, financial market participants and institutions.
August 2013 Global Regulatory Update
August 6, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update provides updates on current work streams.
Culture has moved to center stage as financial services firms continue to revamp risk management functions
July 30, 2013 — Five years after the global financial crisis, leading financial services firms have continued to take major steps to remake their risk governance frameworks and have made substantial progress in implementing risk-management changes, according to “Remaking financial services: risk management five years after the crisis,” a new report by EY in conjunction with the IIF. Among the key findings, a renewed emphasis on risk culture has moved to the top of the list as a chief focus for boards and senior management. A recording of EY’s webcast discussing the report is now available.
IIF Holds Third High-Level Symposium on Effective Supervision
July 22, 2013 — The IIF recently organized and hosted a Third High-Level Symposium on Effective Supervision at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on July 15-16 and with an opening dinner hosted by Citigroup. The symposium followed earlier ones held in Toronto in 2011 and Madrid in 2012. It was attended by roughly 60 senior regulators, supervisors and industry leaders from around the world.
Leading Insurers Support FSB and IAIS's Objective to Preserve Resilience of Global Financial System, Emphasize Stabilizing Role of Insurance Industry
July 18, 2013 — The IIF supports the work of policymakers to contain systemic risk and foster stability of the global financial system. As (re-)insurers provide important benefits to the economy as shock absorbers and long-term investors, any policy measures for designated systemic firms need to be targeted to their business model and ensure a level playing field. The IIF and its insurance members have acknowledged the releases by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) announcing a list of nine Global Systemically Important Insurers (G-SIIs) as well as a policy framework to address systemic risk in insurance.
July 2013 Global Regulatory Update
July 3, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update provides updates on current work streams.
IASB Comment Letter on Financial Instruments – Expected Credit Losses
July 3, 2013 — On July 3, 2013, the IIF’s Senior Accounting Group (SAG) submitted a comment letter to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on its Exposure Draft- Financial Instruments- Expected Credit Losses (ED/2013/3) (the ED). The SAG, further to its response to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on May 31, 2013 continued its analysis of both proposals. The Group believed that a two-stage approach, differentiating the measurement for the good book, is appropriate for impairment but acknowledged the difficulties to define the boundary between the two stages. The SAG urged the IASB to articulate better the list of indicators that could be used to assess the “significant credit deterioration” and to clarify the ability to use all available information to transfer from one stage to another. Finally, the Group reiterated that convergence on this topic remains a priority.
First Latam CRO Forum for 2013
July 2, 2013 — The IIF LATAM Chief Risk Officer Forum took place in Miami on June 13-14. The Forum brought together risk officers in the Latin America region to discuss topics that pertain to risk management in a changing global financial regulatory environment. The forum fostered discussions on the current progress in risk, credit and liquidity management practices across banks in various regions, and the potential impact of current global regulatory developments, including Basel III, for Latin American banks. The presentations can be found to the right of this posting, and are accessible by members.
Joint IIF/IBFed Response to the BCBS Large Exposures Proposals
June 28, 2013 — The IIF and IBFed submitted a letter to the BCBS in response to the consultative document on the Supervisory Framework for Measuring and Controlling Large Exposures. In summary, the letter supported the BCBS’s efforts to harmonize large exposures rules across jurisdictions. The letter recommended that this can be done most effectively if (1) the objective of the LE rule is focused only on capturing the likely loss that would arise from a single large counterparty default; (2) the proposed changes are not viewed in silos but instead are viewed holistically in order to devise a properly calibrated and relatively simple framework; (3) the use of approaches that do not contribute to effective risk management yet do significantly restrict bank activity are avoided, or at least limited; and (4) the LE rule does not duplicate existing regulations in an effort to address issues best dealt with by other regulations, in particular issues related to G-SIBs.
IIF Response to BCBS Consultation on Recognizing Cost of Credit Protection Purchased
June 21, 2013 — The BCBS issued proposals in March that would require banks to recognize the cost of credit protection purchased that have not yet been recognized in earnings as an exposure amount subject to 1250% risk weight. The aim of the proposals is to prevent arbitrage transactions that provide immediate capital relief but without upfront recognition of the cost of the transactions. The IIF response to the proposals underscores the industry concern that the proposed rule could lead to unintended consequences. It could unnecessarily penalize a large number of transactions that are truly intended to mitigate unexpected losses, and will further burden securitization. It could also add further complexity to the risk-based capital framework. Moreover, the significant flexibility given to national regulators in implementing the proposed rule is also a concern because it could lead to level playing field issues. This is inconsistent with the goal of the BCBS to narrow divergences in RWA calculation across banks and jurisdictions.
IIF Weekly Wrap - June 20, 2013
Kevin Nixon, IIF Managing Director for Regulatory Affairs, presents the IIF’s report on Promoting Greater International Regulatory Consistency, outlining the report’s sixteen specific recommendations for action in policy development, implementation, and cross-border supervision, and general recommendations on the role of the FSB.
June 2013 Global Regulatory Update
June 5, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update features a recently released report on International Consistency, reviews recent CRO fora, and provides updates on current work streams.
IIF Calls For Renewed Efforts To Promote Greater International Regulatory Consistency
June 5, 2013 — The Institute of International Finance today released a report encouraging national and global policymakers to promote greater consistency between national regulations. The report reviews current consistency efforts underway and contains sixteen specific recommendations for action. The report, Promoting Greater International Regulatory Consistency, responds to mounting concern in both the financial services industry and regulatory community that the determination to achieve global cooperation and coordination is waning, with jurisdictions tempted towards exceptions and purely national approaches—despite considerable efforts since the financial crisis to agree on and implement international standards.
FASB Comment Letter on Financial instruments – Credit losses
May 31, 2013 — On May 31, 2013, the IIF’s Senior Accounting Group (SAG) submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on its Exposure Draft-Financial Instruments- Credit Losses (subtopic 825-15) (the ED). The SAG reiterated that convergence on the critical point of impairment remains a priority for the group, recognizing the issues the two Boards face in coming to a common conclusion. It has become apparent that both the IASB and the FASB proposals are troubling to the industry because neither of the proposals entirely reflects current risk management or the economic view of risk and its translation into allowances. Although the Group was unable to state a consensus approach, the SAG defined high level principles for provisioning and gave some elements of commonality the group agree on. The group will continue its discussion in answering the IASB proposal.
First IIF MENA CRO Forum for 2013
May 31, 2013 — The IIF MENA Chief Risk Officer Forum took place on May 14 and 15 in Dubai, UAE. The Forum brought together risk officers in the MENA region to discuss topics that pertain to risk management in a changing global financial regulatory environment. The forum fostered discussions on the current progress in risk management practices across banks in various regions, macroeconomic trends in some economies in the region, and the potential impact of current global regulatory reforms on risk management for MENA banks. The presentations can be found to the right of this posting, and are accessible by members.
FASB Comment Letter on Financial instruments - Classification and measurement
May 15, 2013 — On May 15, 2013, the IIF’s Senior Accounting Group (SAG) submitted a comment letter to the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on its Exposure Draft-Financial Instruments- Overall (subtopic 825-10) Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (the ED). The SAG concluded that the ED would constitute an important step forward toward convergence of accounting standards, depending on the final outcome of the proposals. Following the parallel comment letter on the same topic to the IASB, the SAG urged the Board to clarify and improve the treatment of the attributes of financial assets that would be allowed to be measured at Amortized Cost or at Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income, and the business-model requirements of the proposal. The letter stressed that modifications were needed to ensure that the requirements would be operational, reflect a firm’s actual business models, and result in decision-useful information for investors. The group also asked the Boards to analyze the costs and benefits of the “solely payment of principal and interest” (SPPI) test compared to the existing bifurcation criteria and to consider going back to the bifurcation criteria if the SPPI test cannot be clarified and made operational in a satisfactory way.
First IIF Asia Pacific CRO Forum for 2013
May 23, 2013 — On May 6-7, the IIF held the first Asia-Pacific Chief Risk Officers Forum for 2013 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, hosted by Maybank. The Forum brought together risk officers in the Asia-Pacific region to discuss topics that pertain to risk management in a changing global financial regulatory environment. The forum fostered discussions on the current progress in risk management practices across banks in various regions, macroeconomic trends in some economies in the region, and the potential impact of current global regulatory reforms on risk management for Asia-Pacific banks. The presentations featured topics on proposed regulations on the OTC derivatives market , risk governance and risk culture in the Asian context, operational risk management, stress testing for natural disasters, and SME credit risk framework. The presentations can be found to the right of this posting, and are accessible by members.
April 2013 Global Regulatory Update
May 6, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update features updates on current work streams, reviews recent meetings, and discusses new projects.
IIF Submission of FBO Comment Letter
April 30, 2013 — The IIF recently submitted comments on the Federal Reserve’s proposed rule for enhanced supervision and early remediation requirements for foreign banking organizations. In the letter, the IIF expressed its concerns with the proposed rule as it relates to the development of sound and consistent global financial regulation. In particular, the implementation of the proposed rule would likely a trigger a domino effect toward regulatory fragmentation and balkanization of global finance, which would have significant implications for global financial stability and the global economy. The IIF recommends that the Board revisit the proposed rule and adapt it so that it more closely aligned with the G20’s global commitments to enhanced global supervision and consistent, coordinated cross-border resolution.
IIF Weekly Wrap - April 26, 2013
Kevin Nixon, IIF Managing Director for Regulatory Affairs, discusses the increasing trend towards fragmentation—a concern raised in the IIF’s recent policy letter to the G-20 on “The Risk of Fragmentation in a Global Economy”—and the costs of layering of redundant regulations, recommending the IIF co-signed letter on “Margin Requirements for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives.” Kevin also previews the IIF’s upcoming report on “Promoting Greater International Regulatory Consistency,” to be released in the coming weeks, and invites members to participate in the work of the IIF’s regulatory committees and working groups.
Joint Associations’ Letter on Margin Requirements for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives
April 12, 2013 — The IIF, ISDA, AFME, and SIFMA submitted a letter to the BCBS, IOSCO, FSB, CPSS and CGFS reiterating industry concerns on the proposed margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives. It reformulates the arguments already presented in our earlier letters on the issue, but also explicitly asked for the withdrawal or suspension of any IM requirements until their consequences have been fully analyzed and clarified.
IIF Responds to IASB Classification and Measurement Draft
April 3, 2013 — On April 3, 2013, the IIF’s Senior Accounting Group (SAG) submitted a comment letter to the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on its Exposure Draft 2012/4 Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement; Limited Amendments to IFRS (the ED). The SAG concluded that the ED would resolve important issues on the boundary between instruments to be carried at Amortized Cost and as opposed to Fair Value through Profit and Loss that have arisen under the existing IFRS 9. It would also constitute an important step forward toward convergence of accounting standards, depending on the final outcome of the IASB’s proposal and a parallel proposal of the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (on which the SAG will comment in a few weeks).
March 2013 Global Regulatory Update
April 2, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update features updates on current work streams and highlights upcoming events.
IIF responds to IOSCO on Client Asset Protection
March 25, 2013 — The IIF recently submitted comments in response to the IOSCO consultative report, Recommendations Regarding the Protection of Client Assets. In its comments, the IIF made clear the industry shares the concern of IOSCO for the protection of client assets and stressed the importance of supervision of intermediaries holding client assets. The IIF also noted that the responsibility for client asset protection should be shared among intermediaries, governments and clients and that there should be a balance between strengthening the protection of client assets and allowing intermediaries to develop innovative and safe means for handling client assets. Finally, the IIF recommended that IOSCO continue to consult with the industry as it pursues work on some of the areas of client asset protection not covered in the report.
IIF responds to the BCBS-IOSCO second consultation on Margin Requirements for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives
March 15, 2013 — The IIF sent a letter to BCBS and IOSCO in response to their second consultative document on Margin Requirements for Non-Centrally Cleared Derivatives. The letter reiterated views expressed in previous IIF letters on the topic, and expressed appreciation of the important steps taken by the BCBS and IOSCO in addressing possible liquidity impact of the proposed rules. However, additional revisions are needed to address the potential liquidity impact, to clarify the practical implementation issues of the proposed rules, and to ensure that the rules will result in a level playing field.
IIF responds to the BCBS consultation on Revisions to the Basel Securitization Framework
March 15, 2013 — The IIF sent a letter to BCBS in response to its consultative document on Revisions to the Basel Securitization Framework. The letter expressed the view that revisions to the securitization framework should reflect in a reasonable way the actual risk of the transactions. In addition, the letter noted that while it is important to address the shortcomings of the current Basel securitization framework, this should be done within the context of the structural progress market participants in securitization have made since the crisis, as well as other bodies of regulations that have made the financial system safer.
February 2013 Global Regulatory Update
March 4, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update features updates on current work streams and highlights upcoming events.
IIF and IBFed letter to the BCBS Large Exposures Group
February 5, 2013 — The IIF and IBFed led industry participants in a meeting with the BCBS Large Exposures Group (LEG) on January 15 in Basel. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss industry practices in managing single-name concentration risk. The discussions at the meeting would serve as input to the LEG’s work on developing harmonized standards for large exposures rules across jurisdictions. As a follow-up step to the meeting, the IIF and IBFed wrote a letter to the LEG outlining the key messages that the industry would like the LEG to consider in developing the standards.
January 2013 Global Regulatory Update
January 31, 2013 — This month’s IIF Global Regulatory Update reviews recent IIF regulatory events as well as comment letters on derivatives, hedge accounting, shadow banking, and other current issues.
IIF provides input to the IASB Survey on disclosure
January 16, 2013 — The SAG answered an IASB survey on disclosure concepts intended to prepare for a “discussion forum” on Disclosures in Financial Reporting, stressing that the IASB should take a broad conceptual approach, focused on what disclosures are likely to look like five years hence, and highlighting the following points:
- A clear and coherent roadmap to assist users to understand annual reports should be defined;
- Standard setters should work with regulators and users to define and limit the purposes of annual reports;
- While accounting, prudential, and securities disclosures may remain siloed, each body of requirements should be defined with reference to and in awareness of the others;
- Impairment, classification and measurement, and leasing remain critical to investors in financial firms and to regulation; divergences should be minimized;
- Requiring additional disclosures is not the solution for reconciling any divergence that occurs between the major accounting standards;
- Specific, mandatory requirements should be minimized to encourage appropriate exercise of judgment and reflection of management’s view of the firm.
IIF Responds to FSB on Shadow Banking
January 11, 2013 — The IIF has sent a comment letter to the Financial Stability Board (FSB) responding to three consultative documents on shadow banking: “Strengthening Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking: An Integrated Overview of Policy Recommendations”, “Strengthening Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking: A Policy Framework for Strengthening Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking Entities” and “Strengthening Oversight and Regulation of Shadow Banking: A Policy Framework for Addressing Shadow Banking Risks in Securities Lending and Repos”.